Conclusion
Articles that were scored above ‘Satisfactory’
were further examined to determine to what degree they provided support
for the use of Reiki as a healing modality (see Figure below). Perhaps
the strongest evidence that Reiki has a demonstrable biological effect
comes from the carefully controlled studies on rats by Baldwin and
colleagues (2006, 2008; both rated ‘Excellent’). In a laboratory
setting, Reiki (performed at a distance from the animals) significantly reduced
stress responses relative to sham Reiki. It should not be
surprising that animal studies form the strongest indication of Reiki’s
effectiveness, as experiments in the laboratory can be designed to
control for most variables that would otherwise complicate studies on
human subjects. Interestingly, depression and stress were also
the two clinical conditions that responded in a significant way to Reiki
intervention (Shore, 2004; rated ‘Excellent’), consistent with the
preclinical findings of Baldwin . Further evaluation in expanded
preclinical and clinical studies on stress, anxiety and depression
reduction are therefore warranted.
Additional publications by Dressin and Singg (1998; rated
‘Satisfactory to Very Good’), Wirth et al (1993; rated ‘Satisfactory to
Very Good’), and Vitale and O’Connor (2006; rated ‘Very Good to
Excellent’) all suggest a benefit of Reiki in controlling pain
levels in humans, but firm conclusions cannot be drawn as each
study design contained one or more confounding variables.
In our analysis, there was only one solidly negative result
(Assefi and Bogart, 2008; rated ‘Excellent’) in a study showing no
statistically significant effect of Reiki on fibromyalgia-associated
pain levels. This observation suggests that although Reiki intervention
may be useful in some settings, it is not universally effective in all
clinical indications, as is also the case for more conventional drug
treatments. Negative results such as these are quite helpful in guiding
the focus of future controlled studies.
Overall, based on the summaries of those studies that were
rated as Very Good or Excellent by at least one reviewer and were not
rated as weak by any reviewer, 83% show moderate to strong evidence in
support of Reiki as a therapeutic modality.
|
Solid Initial Evidence of No Effect |
Suggestive Initial Evidence of No Effect |
Mixed or Conditional (study design and/or execution issues) |
Suggestive Initial Evidence of Positive Effect |
Solid Initial Evidence of Positive Effect on Which to Base
Future Studies |
CLINICAL Indication or
Condition |
1. Pain in fibromyalgia |
1. Post stroke rehabilitation
and recovery |
1. Post operative pain after
tooth extraction
2 .Cognition in elderly, Alzheimers
3. Pre-operative relaxation and post op
pain
4. Well-being in Reiki practitioners |
1. Pain in chronically ill
patients |
1. Depression and stress
2. Well-being in Reiki practitioners |
PRECLINICAL Indication or
Condition |
|
|
|
|
1. Stress response in rats |
|